|
|
A fundamental difference of paradigm
exists between the Electromechanical and Mechanical worlds. The
obvious involves the difference between "logical/systems" and "physical/mechanics".
The less
obvious but more important paradigm difference to the software and technology
tool developers is a recurring and historic headache to the electromechanical
design and manufacturing industries: instantiation. It is
still inexplicably absent from the enterprise and pure mechanical technology
tools, other than in graphical representation and analysis.
Once a mechanical design is completed, it is managed via Bills-of-Material
(BOM) in various levels of "roll-up". Everything is known about a mechanical
design: part number, part name, quantity, revision, purchased or fabricated,
color, hardness, surface treatment, specifications ... except one of the
most important characteristics: instantiation, an attribute that
is critical to the electromechanical world.
The reason that instantiation is poorly managed in mechanical
is the fact that a drawing or 3D data represent the "missing information"
but is typically not available to data management.
Instantiation presumes several other important attributes such
as topology and detail proximity, characteristics that mechanical analysis
and simulation tools do use but Bills-Of-Material do
not
Mechanical instantiation can be best described with a product
design example. Consider a 200mm square tooling plate with four 10 mm diameter
jig feet located 20mm from each edge.
CAD data contains the X, Y, Z locations as well as the i, j,
and k vectors of all components, presuming that the five objects are solids.
The BOM disregards physical location and object proximity simply
reporting:
| Detail |
Quantity
|
Part Number
|
Part Name
|
1
|
1
|
5061772
|
Plate, Tooling
|
2
|
4
|
9227-20
|
Feet, Jig
|
Consider a similar electromechanical design of a four connector harness:
An oversimplified electromechanical "BOM" can be represented
as:
| Detail |
Quantity
|
Part Number
|
Part Name
|
Related Detail
|
Location
|
1-1
|
1
|
CI-90023
|
Connector
|
2-1
|
10,15,20
|
1-2
|
1
|
CI-90023
|
Connector
|
2-2
|
70,15,20
|
1-3
|
1
|
CI-90023
|
Connector
|
2-3
|
10,50,20
|
1-4
|
1
|
CI-90023
|
Connector
|
2-4
|
70,50,20
|
2-1
|
35mm
|
PV-18
|
Wire, 18ga
|
1-1
|
--
|
2-2
|
35mm
|
PV-18
|
Wire, 18ga
|
1-2
|
--
|
2-3
|
35mm
|
PV-18
|
Wire, 18ga
|
1-3
|
--
|
2-4
|
35mm
|
PV-18
|
Wire, 18ga
|
1-4
|
--
|
2-5
|
100mm
|
PV-18
|
Wire, 18ga
|
2-1,2-2,2-3,2-4
|
--
|
To the mechanical enthusiast, this amount of collected data
may appear to be both trivial but intuitively correct in that the proximity
information is available as 3D.
The Warranty and Service personnel, this information is critical to
understanding the effects of usage and environment on the performance of
an individual detail or subassembly.
The next generation Product Data Management system will be capable of
knowing and retrieving virtually every aspect of a component's composition,
as reflected in the following chart:
Only after all definition, proximity, and location information
is known to the components composing a product definition will the worlds
of electromechanical and mechanical achieve a true level of integration.
|